Main MenuPacifica Websites |
Elections Mainpage
the Candidates WBAI Listener Candidates Albert Solomon Candidate Statement Albert Solomon Candidate Statement
Mr. Albert Baron Solomon has not qualified as a candidate for WBAI Local Station Board. Edict on the statement of Mr. Albert Solomonby National Elections Supervisor Casey Peters The Candidate Packet issued to all persons who expressed an interest in running for any of the five Local Station Boards contained a checklist of nomination requirements and copies of Fair Campaign Provisions with guidelines on candidate statements. The checklist reads, in part: “In drafting your statement, you may begin with your name, include your experience, skills, and the main theme you want to emphasize in your opening paragraph, as this is all many voters may read.” Pacifica Bylaws Article Four Section 2-B sets forth required documents that the nominee for Local Station Board shall submit. Point (3) requires: “a written statement of up to 500 words in length by the candidate introducing himself/herself and his/her interest in, or qualifications for, servings as a Delegate, which statement shall be distributed, or otherwise made available, to the Members entitled to vote along with the written ballot”. When candidates submit statements which may be considered inappropriate, we need to look for compliance with the Bylaws. Pacifica Election Supervisors are not an investigatory body, nor a court of law. We do not have the time and energy, the expertise, nor the legal authority to hold hearings and weigh evidence. However, in the case of Albert Solomon, whose racially-charged entry has been deemed offensive by Pacifica activists nationwide, not only the spirit but the letter of the Bylaws was violated, in that his statement contained no information "introducing himself/herself and his/her interest in, or qualifications for, serving as a Delegate." A precedent was set for such circumstances in 2003 at KPFK when Chris Condon and John Wenger were disqualified as candidates for not having submitted valid candidate statements in a timely manner. Therefore, Mr. Solomon has not qualified as a candidate for the WBAI Local Station Board.
Pacifica National Board resolution
Motion: Discriminatory Delegate Candidate Statements
1. The Pacifica National Board (PNB) declares that it is contrary to the Pacifica mission and the Foundation's policy forbidding discrimination, and shall not be allowed, for any Delegate candidate to use Pacifica resources to distribute discriminatory statements on the basis of race, nationality, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability/disability, or age, as part of any written or oral election-related statements.
2. The PNB charges the Committee to Investigate Allegations of Racism and Sexism with developing recommendations to the PNB for a mechanism to administer and enforce the above-stated policy, and also supports the existing work of the Committee to develop a plan for anti-racism training throughout the network.
3. The PNB condemns the racist characterizations in the candidate statement of WBAI Delegate candidate Albert Solomon, who has since been disqualified, as discriminatory against people of African ancestry and contrary to the Pacifica mission.
4. The PNB urges the National Election Supervisor to arrange that:
a) an on-air statement noting Mr. Solomon's disqualification and summarizing this motion be aired on WBAI with the same frequency as the candidate carts;
b) a mailing be sent to all WBAI members with the text of this motion and an explanatory note;
c) the original candidate statement of Albert Solomon be restored to the Pacifica website so that all are clear on the offensiveness of his words, alongside the text of this motion; and
d) the text of this motion be published prominently on the pacifica.org/elections webpage and on the webpage with the WBAI Listener Candidates.
Yes- 8; [Acie, Rob, Ray, Bob, Lisa, Michael, Margaret and Sarv]
No - 2; [Thomas, Wendy] Abstain -3 [Chandra, Lydia, Sandra]
STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY ALBERT SOLOMON:The Secret History of the WBAI Local Station Board
Trackback(0)
Comments (11)
![]()
fflefever: Lynch mob http://radioactivist.net
I do not mean to trivialize the horrific history of lynchings, but I want to object to the PNB accepting the same standard of "evidence" that a lynch mob does, and acting as it does in denying the accused any opportunity for defense:
"The PNB condemns the racist characterizations in the candidate statement of WBAI Delegate candidate Albert Solomon, who has since been disqualified, as discriminatory against people of African ancestry and contrary to the Pacifica mission." You may agree with the PNB's interpretation; but if you do, you are doing so out of an immediate emotional response, in the absence of a full presentation of the evidence. In a fair hearing, I believe it can be demonstrated that Albert was (1) illustrating the offensiveness of Justice & Unity language preceding this, in which opponents are routinely identified as "white", and that (2) Albert is known to white and black associates alike to be strongly opposed to racism. It is outrageous that J&U operatives are given carte blanche (forgive the pun) to deflect every indictment of their incompetence by accusing critics of "racism", and to instigate racial animosity in Pacifica. Case in point: Lisa Davis, Cerene Roberts, Nia Bediako, and Ayo Harrington finding (by formal vote) no problem with my being told (in an official listserve) that I had a "melanin deficiency" disease when I criticized the blatant incompetence of the Programming Committee chair. --Frank LeFever 1
November 19, 2007
Lila Flowers: Doin' a great job.
For he's a jolly good fellow For he's a jolly good fellow For he's a jolly good feeee-eee-looowwwww He's gonna throw pie in your eye! Congratulations on the birth of a nonracist Nation! Death to the war of words! Lila 2
November 18, 2007
Albert Baron Solomon: Grammar Patrol
Casey you didn't even put the paragraphs in my statement. It is a mess. Please fix it. If you want to defame me and cowtow to your J&U masters, at least do it with style! 3
November 10, 2007
tom: Dan Siegel is corrupt
WBAI is bankrupt. Dan Siegel of the Pacifica National Board is corrupt. He has been temporarily placed on the national board for one month to sabatoge the elections and allow the WBAI Justice and Unity corruption to continue.
4
November 04, 2007
fflefever: P.S. http://www.friendsofwbai.org
I also was personally attacked in racial terms; standard J&U "defense" against criticism.
I had the temerity to criticize Nia Bediako (LSB delegate, chair of the Programming Committee, and wife of the J&U appointed LSB Treasurer) for her mishandling of the planning for an abortive "Town Hall" meeting. Ed Marshall (failed J&U candidate for LSB) posted a message attributing my criticism to my age and other characteristics ("inane OMF"), including my "melanin deficiency" disease. Lisa Davis, who interprets every criticism as racist even when race is not mentioned, voted against disapproving such EXPLICITLY racial attacks in the Programming Committee's official listserve. Subsequently, in a patently discriminatory way, I was deprived of my voting membership in the committee. I had been a member from the beginning, had seen initial progress (towards surveying the staff to ascertain their knowledge of procedures for initiating new programs and evaluating current programs) disrupted by what can only be described as mob tactics. After J&U achieved complete control, it spent the next couple of years doing nothing at all. As a member of the Membership, Outreach, & Fundraising committee I have seen negligible fundraising and pathetic neglect of outreach and membership. As a member of the management Evaluation Comittee, I have seen initial efforts to evaluate the General manager and the program Director disrupted, and the (bylaws mandated) annual evaluations shirked for the next 2 or 3 years. I saw the PD's personal assistant given control of an eventual sham evaluation of the PD [I can give details as to its shoddy methodology]; a process not yet formally reviewed by the complete LSB so far as I know. As a member of the Finance Committee, I have seen stonewalling (management in collusion with J&U) when independent members asked who were the "consultants" that drove consultant expenditures far over what had been budgeted, and asked what they did for their money. Stonewalling when we asked what happened to the proceeds of a fundraiser at Riverside Church (J&U exists primarily to protect the man who diverted the funds to his own use). Stonewalling and derisive retorts when we asked to see explanations of specific budget lines in an effort to find alternatives to staff cuts. Their preference was to ignore continued deterioration of membership and listener support and to adopt absurdly inflated projections of IMPROVED listener support, year after year, in proposed budgets that this year even the national office and the PNB had to condemn. WBAI is bankrupt and our bills are being paid by other Pacifica stations. I could cite a few more examples, but the basic facts are that (1) J&U exists to protect the status quo, (2) every criticism of them or of management is attributed to our being white (not true, as some of us are black) and their being black (not true, as some of their operatives are white), and (3)participants in any interpersonal or governmental exchange are routinely identified by race in J&U descriptions. This tactic has had an impact on programming. Some WBAI producers take this model as an indication of what is acceptable, and many listeners have complained about what they perceive as a pervasive tone of anti-white and anti-semitic undercurrents (and sometimes explicit rhetoric). Some complain in public forums, others vote with their feet. I know. I have done my own outreach (tabling at various demonstrations, handing out home-made leaflets at marches, etc.) and I have met many FORMER members and FORMER listeners that way. --Frank LeFever 5
November 01, 2007
fflefever: Why? Here's why. http://www.friendsofwbai.org
Enough nonsense about Albert's clumsy parody of J&U standard language. He had hoped to shame J&U by identifying people the way they do.
Edwin Johnson, the mole from Texas asks, "Why use racist distinctions? Why do you refer to various people at WBAI by the color of their skin, and do so only to denigrate them? You act like you are some type of superior white man. It is shameful." Why don't you ask Lisa Davis and the other J&U operatives? Ask them about _these_ racial identifications, typical of J&U's racially divisive attacks on those who criticize them or the Program Director they exist to protect (a few things are in print email etc. but many not online go unrecorded): FROM SHEILA HAMNAKA c. Nov. 2005: "...List Prog is predominantly white and they want to get rid of the predominantly Black management and staff at WBAI...they want to replace as much of the staff as possible with 'volunteers'. Volunteerism is easier for people of privilege, and could easily set the stage for takeover of the station by white liberals..." c. MARCH 2007: "People of color, and white people who oppose racism DO NOT = Steve Brown. Look at ACE's faces. Look twice. Then go to www.justiceunity.org and look at the faces of Justice & Unity. A picture is worth a thousand words." LISA DAVIS: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:26 AM "...the fact that she is White and I am Black makes this statement even more egregious..." FRED NGUYEN JANUARY 2006: "...A black woman had been named as the new ED (she was selected by the search Committee). As soon as it was announced, the PNB went into a secret executive session and emerged with a white man as their choice..." SHEILA HAMANAKA: Date: 15 February, 2006 23:26:34 EST "Thanks to the racist gatekeepers in Pacifica, this year the majority of the Pacifica National Board is white..." From: sheila hamanaka Date: Mar 8, 2006 8:05 PM "...Heffley...is white...Lisa is African American. Imagine if this exchange had happened on the floor of the U.S. Congress, if a white Senator said that a Black Senator..." Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:32:14 -0500 From: sheila hamanaka "...she and her predominantly white supporters did the work Bush could not..." LISA DAVIS: "...When I came back home and went to my computer I found the following very insulting message from Carolyn Birden, a White member of the LSB, who did not show up at the LSB meeting in Newark..." LISA DAVIS: "...in the three years I've been sitting on the Board I have frequently witnessed White men and White women scream and argue at the LSB meetings...The LSB has even witnessed a White man publicly curse a woman out..." --Frank LeFever 6
November 01, 2007
Albert Baron Solomon: Shameless (and Foolish) (and Anonymous) Slander http://PACVID1.com/page5.html
This statement, dear anonymous Siegel/ Casey clone or whoever is writing this, is slanderous and viciously partisan. I have done nothing illegal-- as Nameless Siegel even admits! Only in the supercharched racebaiting atmosphere of Pacifica is it a crime to call a black person black. If Siegel and J&U have their way we won't even be able to call a spade a spade, we'll have to call it "a nonracial digging tool." We won't be able to open our mouth at all! Thus you and Siegel are trying to bias this crucial election and undermine any semblance of impartiality or constitutionally protected free speech. Shame on you! ELECTION MOVIES, BRING YOUR POPCORN== OCTOBER CANDIDATE'S FORUM NOW AVAILABLE Look on http://PACVID1.com/page5.html for the latest J&U fearmongering and disinformation: Portraits, Text and Movies on Candidates' forum October 17th at Rev. Martin Luther King State Office Building, 80 minutes. 7
October 29, 2007
edix: Go after the officials
The Pacifica interim executive director and your fellow candidate, and LSB member called you on it.
The verdict is in. 8
October 24, 2007
Petootiepie: Your assumption of what my motives are . . . http://PACVID1.com/page4.html
based only a word, dehumanizes me and you, and is sick and depraved. Thank you. 9
October 24, 2007
edix: Why use racist distinctions?
Why do you refer to various people at WBAI by the color of their skin, and do so only to denigrate them?
You act like you are some type of superior white man. It is shameful. 11
October 24, 2007
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
Login FormWBAI Listener Candidates
|