PNB Mainpage arrow Audit arrow 2008-11-18 Audit Committee Minutes

2008-11-18 Audit Committee Minutes

Pacifica National Audit Committee meeting (by phone)

8:30 pm, EST, November 18, 2008 [Streaming]


MINUTES – drafted November 18, 2008 by Committee Secretary Susan Young

Committee Members attending:            Also attending:
        Bediako (WBAI) Chair;            Corporation Counsel Dan Siegel
        Carolyn Birden (WBAI);           joined for a portion of the call.
        Lisa Davis (WBAI);
        Seth Goldberg (WBAI);
        Evelyn Bethune (KPFT);
        Staci Davis (KPFT);
        Susan Young (KPFT) Secretary;       
        Tracy Rosenberg (KPFA);
        Andrea Turner (KPFA);
        Joe Wanzala (KPFA);
        Shawn Casey O’Brien (KPFK);
        Jack Van Aken (KPFK).

Absent:   Ambrose Lane (WPFW); Donna Warren (KPFK).
       
Meeting called to order 8:41 pm (EST).  Chair convened the meeting.  The Secretary called the roll and confirmed that the quorum requirement of 7 was met.

Agenda:  Andrea Turner moved [to approve]; Seth moved to extend the discussion re Policy to 20 minutes; Carolyn moved to extend the Whistleblower Protection Policy by 20 minutes; vote was 7 to 4 in support of the amendments.   Andrea moved to approve the agenda as amended.  No objection.
        I    Call to order (5 minutes)
        II    Approve agenda (5 minutes)
        III    Discuss with Dan Siegel (5 minutes)
            -  Pacifica Foundation Whistleblower Policy (20 minutes)
            -  Whistleblower Employee Protection Policy (20 minutes)
            -  Whistleblower Policy Tracking Form (5 minutes)
        IV    Approve three docs (5 minutes)
        V    Discuss prior meeting minutes (5 minutes)
        VI    Set next meeting date (5 minutes)
        VII    Adjournment

Discussion regarding the Whistleblower Employee Protection Policy:  

In response to numerous questions and extensive conversation, Corporation Counsel Dan Siegel emphasized that the Whistleblower Employee Protection Policy and Pacifica Foundation Whistleblower Policy are intended to support and expand upon employee protections provided in law.  In fact, the goal of these policy statements is to extend whistleblower protection to financial matters such as accounting standards beyond the protections provided for law, regulation and government policy.  Dan Siegel stated that this policy does not inhibit an employees rights to complain to the Attorney General, SEC or any other body as provided by law.  This policy is to be fully consistent with and supportive of protections under law.  He has struck “only” from both places in paragraph 2.

Jack Van Aken called a point of order that the Chair name a member for being out of order and repeated disruptions of the proceedings, and the chair so named Shawn Casey O’Brien.

(1) Carolyn made a motion to postpone consideration of the Whistleblower Employee Protection Policy to the next meeting (6/6–motion failed).

(2) Susan motion to amend (7 yes, 4 no – motion passed):  Amend the document to include:  “In signing this Policy, the Employee does not waive any rights under law.”

(3) Seth motion to amend (5 no, 3 yes – motion failed):

     “1.  that the only restriction of employees or Pacifica associated people is that of
     confidentiality for those investigation confidential matters.

     2.  That Dan Siegel, Seth Goldberg and others rework the proposed policy and
     return an amended policy within 72 hours in order to make clearer the permissive,
     non restrictive and expanded character of Pacifica’s policy.”

(4) Chair called for a vote on the Whistleblower Employee Protection Policy as amended [as amended per Young’s amendment and deletion of “only” per Siegel] (6 yes, 4 no – motion carried).

(5) Chair called for a vote on the Pacifica Foundation Whistleblower Policy [with changes consistent with amendments per (4)] (5 yes, 3 no – motion carried).

(6) Chair called for a vote on the Whistleblower Policy Tracking Form (7 yes, 2 no – motion carried).

Minutes:  Prior meeting minutes will be taken up at the next meeting (September 10, October 14, October 30, November 6, November 18, 2008).

Set Next Meeting Date:  8:00 pm EST, Tuesday, December 2, 2008.

Additional point:  Shawn Casey O’Brien will draft up suggested notice to post in office regarding employees’ legal rights to blow the whistle, and the Chair will work to get these posted promptly.

Adjourn:  Susan Young moved to adjourn at 10:15 pm (EST).  No objection.

Votes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 above
        no/yes/ o/ o/ o/ o             Nia Bediako (WBAI) Chair;       
        yes/no/abstain/no/no/no    Carolyn Birden (WBAI);     
        no/yes/no/yes/yes/yes       Lisa Davis (WBAI);
        yes/no/yes/no/pass/yes      Seth Goldberg (WBAI);
        no/yes/no/yes/yes/yes       Evelyn Bethune (KPFT);
        yes/yes/pass/yes/x             Staci Davis (KPFT);
        no/yes/no/yes/yes/yes       Susan Young (KPFT) Secretary;       
        yes/x                               Tracy Rosenberg (KPFA);
        no/yes/no/yes/yes/yes       Andrea Turner (KPFA);
        yes/no/yes/no/no/yes        Joe Wanzala (KPFA);
        yes/no/yes/no/no/no         Shawn Casey O’Brien (KPFK);
        no/yes/no/yes/yes/yes       Jack Van Aken (KPFK).

(These minutes were approved on 12/02/2008)

 


Employee Protection (Whistleblower) Agreement


If any employee reasonably believes that some policy, practice, or activity of The Pacifica Foundation (Foundation) is in violation of law, that employee must file a written complaint with the Director Of Human Resources, Executive Director or the Chair of the Audit Committee.   In signing this Policy, the employee does not waive any rights under law.

It is the intent of the Foundation to adhere to all laws and regulations that apply to the organization and the underlying purpose of this policy is to support the organization’s goal of legal compliance. The support of all employees is necessary to achieving compliance with various laws and regulations. An employee is protected from retaliation if the employee brings the alleged unlawful activity, policy, or practice to the attention of the Foundation and provides the Foundation with a reasonable opportunity to investigate and correct the alleged unlawful activity. The protection described below is available to employees that comply with this requirement.  

The Foundation will not retaliate against an employee who in good faith, has made a protest or raised a complaint against some practice of the Foundation, or of another individual or entity with whom the Foundation has a business relationship, on the basis of a reasonable belief that the practice is in violation of law, or a clear mandate of public policy.  The Foundation will not retaliate against employees who disclose or threaten to disclose to a supervisor or a public body, any activity, policy, or practice of the Foundation that the employee reasonably believes is in violation of a law, or a rule, or regulation mandated pursuant to law or is in violation of a clear mandate or public policy concerning the health, safety, welfare, or protection of the environment.

My signature below indicates my receipt and understanding of this policy. I also verify that I have been provided with an opportunity to ask questions about the policy.



_________________________________________ _____________
Employee Signature                                               Date




The Pacifica Foundation Whistleblower Policy


General

The Pacifica Foundation (Foundation) Code of Conduct (hereinafter referred to as the Code) requires directors, board members, paid and un-paid employees/volunteers to observe high standards of business and personal ethics in the conduct of their duties and responsibilities. Employees and representatives of the organization must practice honesty and integrity in fulfilling their responsibilities and comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

The objectives of the Foundation Whistleblower Policy are to establish policies and procedures for:

    * The submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting or audit matters by paid and un-paid employees, directors, officers, and other stakeholders of the organization, on a confidential and anonymous basis.

    * The receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the organization regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters.

    * The protection of directors, volunteers, paid and un-paid employees officers and other stakeholders reporting concerns from retaliatory actions.

Reporting Responsibility

Each director, un-paid and paid staff member, volunteers, officers and other stakeholders of the Foundation has an obligation to report in accordance with this Whistleblower Policy (a) questionable or improper accounting or auditing matters, and (b) violations and suspected violations of the Foundation's Code (hereinafter collectively referred to as Concerns).

Authority of Audit Committee

All reported Concerns will  be forwarded to the Audit Committee in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. The Audit Committee shall be responsible for investigating, and making appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors, with respect to all reported Concerns. The Audit Committee may appoint a Task Force to conduct the investigation.

No Retaliation

This Whistleblower Policy is intended to encourage and enable directors, paid or un-paid employees, volunteers and other stakeholders to raise Concerns within the Organization for investigation and appropriate action. With this goal in mind, no director, paid or un-paid employee, volunteer or other stakeholder who, in good faith, reports a Concern shall be subject to retaliation or, in the case of an employee, adverse employment consequences. Moreover, a paid or un-paid employee who retaliates against someone who has reported a Concern in good faith is subject to discipline up to and including dismissal from the un-paid position, termination of employment or removal from the Local or National Board in accordance with the Foundation’s bylaws.

Reporting Concerns

Employees

Employees should first discuss their Concerns with their immediate supervisor. If, after speaking with his or her supervisor, the individual continues to have reasonable grounds to believe the Concern is valid, the individual should report the Concern to the Director of Human Resources. In addition, if the individual is uncomfortable speaking with his or her supervisor, or the supervisor is a subject of the Concern, the individual should report his or her Concern directly to the Director of Human Resources.

If the Concern was reported verbally to the Director of Human Resources, the reporting individual, with assistance from the Director of Human Resources, shall reduce the Concern to writing. The Director of Human Resources is required to promptly report the Concern to the Chair of the Audit Committee, who has specific and exclusive responsibility along with the Audit Comm. to investigate all Concerns. If the Director of Human Resources, for any reason, does not promptly forward the Concern to the Audit Committee, the reporting individual should directly report the Concern to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Contact information for the Chair of the Audit Committee may be obtained through the Human Resources Department. Concerns may be also be submitted anonymously. Such anonymous Concerns should be in writing and sent directly to the Chair of the Audit Committee.

This policy does not waive any Employee rights under law.

Directors and Other Volunteers

Directors and other volunteers should submit Concerns in writing directly to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Contact information for the Chair of the Audit Committee may be obtained from the Chief Financial Officer. Volunteers at stations should report Concerns to the Hunan Resource Director, who in turn would report directly to the Audit Committee Chair who in turn, would report to the Audit Committee.

Volunteers on committees of the Pacifica National and Local Station Boards should report Concerns directly to the Audit Committee Chair, who would then report to the Audit Committee.

Handling of Reported Violations

The Audit Committee shall address all reported Concerns. The Chair of the Audit Committee shall immediately notify the Audit Committee, the Foundation’s chair, the Executive Director, and Chief Financial Officer of any such report. The Chair of the Audit Committee will notify the sender and acknowledge receipt of the Concern within five business days; if possible, it will not be possible to acknowledge receipt of anonymously submitted Concerns.

All reports will be promptly investigated by the Audit Committee, and appropriate corrective action will be recommended to the Board of Directors, if warranted by the investigation. In addition, action taken must include a conclusion and/or follow-up with the complainant for complete closure of the Concern.

The Audit Committee has the authority to retain outside legal counsel, accountants, private investigators, or any other resource deemed necessary to conduct a full and complete investigation of the allegations, following review for financial impact by the National Finance Committee, and approval by the PNB.

Acting in Good Faith

Anyone reporting a Concern must act in good faith and have reasonable grounds for believing the information disclosed indicates an improper accounting or auditing practice, or a violation of the Codes. The act of making allegations that prove to be unsubstantiated, and that prove to have been made maliciously, recklessly, or with the foreknowledge that the allegations are false, will be viewed as a serious disciplinary offense and may result in discipline, up to and including dismissal from the un-paid position, termination of employment or removal from Local or National Board in accordance with the Foundation’s bylaws. Such conduct may also give rise to other actions, including civil lawsuits.

Confidentiality

Reports of Concerns, and investigations pertaining thereto, shall be kept confidential to the extent possible, consistent with the need to conduct an adequate investigation.

Disclosure of reports of Concerns to individuals not involved in the investigation will be viewed as a serious disciplinary offense and may result in discipline, up to and including termination of employment, dismissal from un-paid position or removal from Local or National Board. Such conduct may also give rise to other actions, including civil lawsuits.




The Pacifica Foundation Whistleblower Policy
Reported Concern Tracking Report

 Tracking
 Number

 Date of
 Filing
 Location of
 Filing

 Report 
Filed by:

 Description of
 Concern Reported
Current
 Status
         Actions,       
 Notes
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      P -
 Pending / No Action
      UI -
 Under Investigation
      W -
 Withdrawn
      D -
 Dismissed
      R -
 Resolved

 

(Adapted from a standard speadsheet.)

< Prev   Next >